CEO's, as should all business-people, whether they're with private or public companies, should at least *try* to appear articulate and educated.
I doubt I'm alone in preferring to invest in companies run by people more intelligent than myself. If they show themselves to be less intelligent, why would I trust them with my money?
I'm watching this only out of the corner of my eye because this whole concept of a "reset" suddenly making the stock "worth" $54 per share leaves me nothing short of incredulous.
I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but I'm no spoon. And the concept that a stock that's already trading can suddenly trade at nearly 70 times its current value at the CEO's whim is a brand new one on me. And being a devout Missourian, I don't believe it because I haven't seen it.
"Reset" isn't another way of saying "reverse split", is it?
