InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 20
Posts 3752
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/18/2006

Re: justfrank post# 38674

Saturday, 08/26/2006 1:13:09 PM

Saturday, August 26, 2006 1:13:09 PM

Post# of 157300
That was not the part of the statement I was referring to when I said at "their discretion". The part I was referring to was this-

"In the event VPN determines" I don't think its much of a twist at all to say if they are the ones making the determination, it is at their discretion.

<<<You nor anyone else on this board knows what expectations are spelled out in the agreement.>>> That is correct, but I am using what we do know from the 10Q, and I have not seen a link or quote from anyone that changes what the 10Q said.

I will be the first to admit my opinions are subjective, I thought that was the very nature of opinions. But I do post many facts with my opinion like this one-

"FROM THE AUG. 14, 2006 [10Q]
On June 7, 2006, the Company entered into an Initial Network Installation Agreement with VPN de Mexico...
VPN has paid a $225,000 deposit to GlobeTel as 50% of the initial cost of the network. ... In the event VPN determines that the network does not operate in accordance with its expectations, then the $225,000 deposit will be returned to VPN by the Company."

If that is not factual, its not my fault.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.