InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 46
Posts 3467
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/21/2003

Re: tampa123 post# 3869

Wednesday, 08/06/2003 10:19:17 AM

Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:19:17 AM

Post# of 248948
yeah, Ellen Sheng should be fired!

tampa, Wave coulda definitely been more assertive in dealing w/her shoddy work. they probably shoulda contacted DJ immediately upon the reporting of a "contract."

howiever, who among us read the IBM release & inferred a K?!? definitely not me. i thought, "man, this is kinda fluffy -- another one of those, 'we can do this!' PRs."

The reporter did not confirm her INFERENCE w/either company until *after* it was on the wire. Then, she was cornered & hadta contact Intel as well to make sure it wasn't a scam!

To make matters worse, she included the KPMG "going concern letter" from the last SEC filings as if it was just released. Now CNBC picks it up & refers to it in the present tense "KPMG is expressing substantial doubts... blah, blah, blah...

It was piss-poor reporting.

Could Wave have done a better job of damage control?

you betcha.

should they have been pushed into such a position?

not if Ellen Sheng had adhered to generally accepted journalistic practices.

AND, DJ Editors wear some egg too - they ran the story w/out vetting the "facts." It is an Editors job to ensure that the report is *accurate* before it runs.

Not the day after...

SPIN

PS i definitely agree that this does serious harm to Wave's credibility FWIW.

PPS i dumped @ the open...

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.