InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 106
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/07/2008

Re: FunkyCoolModena post# 43803

Monday, 02/27/2017 10:02:00 AM

Monday, February 27, 2017 10:02:00 AM

Post# of 47790
Thank you for your kind reply. Would agree that the Federal suit should be taken care of first. We also have been given a glimpse into how the other side behaves. This is what worries me, just because right is on your side doesn't mean any ruling will be in your favor. We must take care to not allow our defense to be watered down to obscurity. We need only look at past court cases involving this group to know this.
Knowing that the Fed. case has charged conspiracy it should be fairly easy to determine a course of action. Am not aware of any depositions taken for the Fed. case. IMO we should insist on same as topics brought up there can be used in court as long as the judge allows it.
Who brought these charges? From reading here there are some actors have legal problems not related to this suit, how does that affect this suit?
In my post about defining our company from a to z it may or may not help but one would could use it as a counter if it were known, and used in court.
We would be wise in leaving no stone unturned. We would be wise in having a lawyer who will not slow walk this case and ask the questions we want asked. Who are scheduled to testify on both sides? Those should be listed for depositions. Time is now to know our stuff, put up or shut up.