IRRESPONSIBLE JOURNALISM CAUSES CONFUSION
the scribe that wrote the inaccurate DJ piece inferred a contractual arrangement without confirming it w/either company.
DJ then takes a swipe @ Wave towards the end of the "correction."
Just as numerous reports have been published in recent days indicating that Wave is a Portland Or based concern, based solely on the Intel PR dateline.
In the post-Jayson Blair era, it would seem that DJ would have taken the responsibility for the error. Instead, they have attributed it to inarticulate PR writing. When i read the IBM PR, I did NOT come away from it w/the impression that a contract had been inked.
the DJ scribe should be relegated to proofreading WSJ classified advt section for the next year!
AH trades are off (seemingly in response to this, ahem, "correction.")
weak,
SPIN
PS e-mails to the DJ editors would not be inappropriate IMO.