MORE ON BRILLIANT LIGHT POWER
KMBJN....I've really got to hand it to you. Bringing up BLP is brilliant because it's an example of what we debate here.
The difference between BLP and NNVC is that NNVC's claims do not conflict with basic physics. BLP's do. Someday what NNVC claims it can do will be done. The question debated here is will NNVC be the company that carries the ball over the finish line. As for BLP's claims, no one ever will be cause is is wrong at the level of fundamental physics. All of Quantum Mechanics would have to be wrong for Randy Mills to be right.
BLP is brilliant because Randy has been able to use this nonsense to make a lot of money. Honest...no. Brilliant Yes. PT Barnum said it long ago and it remains true today....there's a sucker born every minute.
Having faith in others is a wonderful human trait. But faith without discernment can get us into real trouble. A fool and his money are soon parted.
Trendliner
Brilliant Light Power
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Brilliant Light Power, Inc.
Company logo
Founded HydroCatalysis Inc.[1] in 1991.[2]
Founder Randell L. Mills
Headquarters 493 Old Trenton Rd.
Cranbury Township, New Jersey, USA
Number of employees
22 fulltime, 8 consultants[3]
Subsidiaries "Millsian, Inc.".
Website BrilliantLightPower.com
Brilliant Light Power, Inc. (BLP), formerly BlackLight Power, Inc. of Cranbury, New Jersey is a company founded by Randell L. Mills, who claims to have discovered a new energy source. The purported energy source is based on Mills' assertion that the electron in a hydrogen atom can drop below the lowest energy state known as the ground state. Mills calls these hypothetical hydrogen atoms that are in an energy state below ground level, "hydrinos".[1] Mills self-published a closely related book, The Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics and has co-authored articles on claimed hydrino-related phenomena.[4][5]
Critics say it lacks corroborating scientific evidence, and is a relic of cold fusion. Critical analysis of the claims have been published in the peer reviewed journals Physics Letters A, New Journal of Physics, Journal of Applied Physics, and Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. These works note that the proposed theory is inconsistent with quantum mechanics, and that the proposed hydrino states are unphysical and incompatible with key equations that have been experimentally verified many times.
In 1999, the Nobel prize winning physicist Philip Warren Anderson said he is "sure that it's a fraud",[6] and in the same year another Nobel prize winning physicist, Steven Chu, called it "extremely unlikely".[7] In 2009, IEEE Spectrum magazine characterized it as a "loser" technology because "[m]ost experts don't believe such lower states exist, and they say the experiments don't present convincing evidence" and mentioned that Wolfgang Ketterle had said the claims are "nonsense".[8] BLP has announced several times that it was about to deliver commercial products based on Mill's theories but has not delivered a working product.[8]
