InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,464.62
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,220.00
(
-0.20%
)
Dow Jones
39,150.33
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.34
(
0.37%
)
Bitcoin
63,051.64
(
-0.17%
)
Post# of 68829
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

riskreward007

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 26
Posts 799
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/13/2012

riskreward007

Re: Krysti post# 67298

Thursday, 01/26/2017 3:22:35 PM

Thursday, January 26, 2017 3:22:35 PM

Post# of 68829
No, you don't understand patent assignments (see below).


A patent assignment can get complicated. It can be the transfer of a your entire ownership interest or a percentage of your ownership interest in the patent.

www.the-business-of-patents.com/patent-assignment.html



REVO did not assign total ownership of its patents to Eyetalk365 it was only a partial assignment, so that Eyetalk could pursue patent infringers.

If Ross Helfer and Eyetalk365 own the REVO patents where are the documents stating this on USPTO.com???
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up