InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 62
Posts 10254
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/03/2008

Re: int10a post# 45408

Wednesday, 01/18/2017 2:32:42 PM

Wednesday, January 18, 2017 2:32:42 PM

Post# of 47873
How many times have I said this same thing that the filing says here?

"Despite defaults under the parties' loan agreements, DMRJ refrained from accelerating the Debtors' obligation to pay all principal and interest due and foreclosing on all the Debtors' assets, which would have eliminated any value for unsecured creditors, much less equity.
Put simply, Debtors could not have stayed in business or reached the point they are today without the support of DMRJ and Montsant. "



How many times did I say this?

Committee cites the recent federal indictment of certain former executives associated with the
lender and related SEC and civil litigation, even though these charges, while certainly serious, are
entirely unrelated to the DMRJ Parties and Debtors.



Why can't shareholders understand this?

Note, none of the committee had ANY problem with the financing until bankruptcy was filed! lol If the financing was so bad, you should have sued then, or just sell the stock BEFORE this disaster!

update.... They actually said this too! lol

The overwhelming majority of the claims that the Equity
Committee seeks to bring here arose pre-petition and, therefore, could have been brought by Debtors at any time, including while Mr. Bolduc was in charge, i



Just sour grapes from losing shareholders!

What a waste of taxpayers money this is! Luckily, at least the IMSC shareholders are paying the legal costs!!!
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.