InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 112
Posts 10856
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/01/2009

Re: ricanich post# 36371

Friday, 01/13/2017 3:12:37 PM

Friday, January 13, 2017 3:12:37 PM

Post# of 54032
HOGWASH!

Motion to Dismiss was basically denied, or dismissed as moot. If that motion had been granted TAUG would have had to refile the case from the beginning and everything that transpired in Florida would have been lost.

For the 100th time, in the interest of justice the judge transferred the case to New Jersey so that TAUG would not have to start over.


The Motion to DISMISS was moot...the MOTION TO TRANSFER WAS GRANTED!
FACT
But you don't have to take my word for it...
CUZ I HAVE ACTUAL FACTS AND LINKS...lol...
"ORDER granting 23 Motion to Transfer Venue, denying as moot Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 9/30/2016. (pes) (Entered: 09/30/2016)

http://ia601509.us.archive.org/7/items/gov.uscourts.njd.338448/gov.uscourts.njd.338448.docket.html

BTW...this is ALSO INCORRECT...

There is a pending motion from Florida for a six month extension of the original trial date.


The "original" trial date was
"Trial set for 11/7/2016 09:00 AM in West Palm Beach Division before Judge Robin L. Rosenberg"
DANG!!! TAUG is already 2 months PAST the "original" trial date
and by January 24th, TAUG will be PAST the SECOND TRIAL DATE...lol...
"Trial set for 1/23/2017 at 9:00 AM in West Palm Beach Division before Judge Robin L. Rosenberg"

WHO CARES if the trial actually begins in July or MAY???
It's ALREADY BEEN DELAYED...and DELAYED AGAIN!
ROTFLMAO


Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.