surf'sup...
i haven't violated the TOS.
that'd be you!
i'm a squeaky wheel for reform (you saying there *isn't* a need for it?).
i do not want inside info.
my comments are to the "we knew it all along" crowd.
how'd they know?
i know in the binary world of the most zealous void there are only two possibilities (or acceptable viewpoints).
LONG cheerleader -OR- "sell & move on" (which the 2nd half of the logic is designed to support the first).
i questioned (& will continue to do so) the MANAGEMENT of this company. you think a fund analyst *won't* ask questions about "loans"? You live in a dreamworld if you think Wall Street scrutiny will tolerate the "family biz" conduct of this *publicly traded* company.
you are entitled to think that stuff like that is fine...we'll have to disagree.
AND, much has changed over the years - INCLUDING my understanding of the law & that includes corporate, M&A and securities.
if you believe that wave mgmt has been 100% honest, forthcoming, saintly or whatever, it's your perogative.
Wall Street will disagree with that viewpoint & be much closer to mine. Your position would logically include scenarios where mutual fund managers would hold wavx & ask no questions.
if your view was in accordance, there would be little need for any financial publications -- all they'd need is to publish the prices, volume, etc.
so i'm worse than a basher -- i put my capital into the company & expect proper corporate governance & adherence to fiduciary duty as a shareholder...
yeah, *that* makes sense!
Trance is *not* my cohort btw... i'm MUCH younger.
you're of the ilk that would have approved of Enron (as long as you made a profit on the stock).
it's nonsensical whether you believe it or not. it's funny - all i want from wave is to end the monkey business & self dealing, self gorging actually... that is NOT too much to ask.
SPIN
PS go check the record - "for years" i didn't post. AND when i came back (even when i wasn't long) i rooted for you guys to get your money back.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
