Everyone has an opinion. That doesn't mean that I need to agree with yours. If you are in retail of any kind in any country you know that you do not have a deal until you have the customers money in your bank account. Until then you have nothing but a "be back". Even after they say they are going to buy your product you still have nothing without a signature on a contract. In the case of government contracts you still have nothing without the money in the bank. Governments are notorious for backing out even with a signed contract, and there is not a damn thing you can do about it. In this case I would believe that the management has learn a hard lesson. No talk until you have the money. This learning curve doesn't mean they are a fraud or are crooked. Just a little naive.
There are always at least two sides to a story, and all sides will claim to be true
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.