Mountainstar Gold Inc (fka MSX)

[Grand Poobah]

What are you referring to? Care to expand on what you think is truthful or not?

Why do you think the Precautionary Measure of C-1912-2001 is still valid against the Pascua Lama claims?

Is it truthful for Barrick to claim ownership of these claims when they are not in their name with a precautionary measure preventing all acts and contracts over them since 2001?

The effort by Barrick dealing with their Pascua title fraud has been in the Chile courts since 2001. The reason it's taken this long is Barrick and Hector Unda Llanos and Barricks billions of dollars has been untruthful to the courts and dragged the issue for the last 15 years.

In 2006 the courts ruled, $20 was not the agreed to price for the Pascua claims which represents Barricks current salt and nitrate Amarillo 1-3000 claims. They also ruled the contract to be unconstitutional. The precautionary measure dealing with this is still in force and Mr Jorge Lopehandia is the only individual defending his clean Amarillo Sur and Amarillo Norte claims.

Everyone knows $20 was not a valid agreed contract for Pascua. I see no judgement which validates this contract in favour of Barrick. What we do know and is not disputed is the precautionary measure is still active and prevents Barrick ownership.

The BCSC has knowledge that Barrick does not have ownership of Pascua. I question why the BCSC does not act To prevent the listing by Silver Wheaton which states Barrick owns the Tesoro claims as they are clearly not owned by Barrick.