InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 112
Posts 10856
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/01/2009

Re: clearmont88 post# 35824

Thursday, 12/29/2016 12:33:09 PM

Thursday, December 29, 2016 12:33:09 PM

Post# of 54032
If you went back and reviewed my previous posts on this subject, you would see that the example of fees paid was just tossed out as an example of "damages" that could be proven...
I have even said in the past that I believe some punitive award could be in order.

But I continue to believe that TAUG has done everything they can to MAKE the "damages" appear to be MORE.
Like what happened at the end of July 2015...lol...

I am QUITE sure that TAUG never thought this whole thing would drag on the way it has...
I think they probably thought they could walk away with whatever the insurance limit was...
but my guess is that the insurance company refused to roll over and just give away "millions" in claimed "damages" to a penny stock company with essentially NOTHING.

Reality is this whole thing has been a series of mistakes made by Shaw.
From filing the lawsuit BEFORE going through mediation as required
to filing in the wrong venue, reneging on the agreement to transfer,
and on and on...

I guess I'll wait for the trial and see WHAT "damages" are actually PROVEN.

How's that "loss of market cap" claim coming???
Oh...wait...

ROTFLMAO

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.