InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 23
Posts 1036
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/17/2015

Re: None

Wednesday, 12/28/2016 11:11:21 PM

Wednesday, December 28, 2016 11:11:21 PM

Post# of 235061
Hey Pope ...sorry no PM...what i can say i am also a bit worried about non perfomance form SFOR.....private companies eg ACS seem way valuable than us, even though they are dependant, on sfor technology. For now it makes sense for Kay to give contracts to ACS ....for a 15% return, since sfor does not have enough resources and therefore man power to meet the market demands, so will we continue losing our full share of the contracts to ACS?? Kay may need to answer that part ...i still believe SFOR and the technology are good...just that we need a very strong radical change on how we will handle huge contracts....i am not happy with the contracts going to ACS!!...Mr Kay has to do better than what he told us about his strategy.....of making SFOR GREAT.The other option is for Mr Kay to make sure we get some shares of ACS....right now 15% is not good....above all the ACS connection is not very clear to us shareholders.