InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 423
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/11/2010

Re: es1 post# 154648

Sunday, 12/25/2016 2:21:18 AM

Sunday, December 25, 2016 2:21:18 AM

Post# of 165854

Could be true. However I assume in Canada like the US the creditors would first need to get a court to help them stop the transfer. In that court they would need to prove that the company owes them which in this case would also expose said creditor to anything they have done wrong in their investment of the property.
I would venture a guess this is why there has been no court help to stop the transfer.



For sure Scott and Currah would have no problem to explain a judge their shady deals from which Currah claims that SRSR owes him several thousand CAD. Especially if (I guess) their deals were only verbal contracts over several years and over several thousand CAD and with the background of Currah (= convicted fraudster) this is a clear-cut deal for the judge.
Scott would be destroyed beyond recognition.

For sure there would be two other parties in the court room. The Canadian tax authorities and the OSC. I am sure Andrew Currah, as the honest man he is, was not violating any of his imposed restrictions from the previous OSC settlement. OSC his 10 year Nothing to fear for McCurrah!

Lets not forget, the only reason why Currah is writing in this forum is, he and Scott want to press the last penny out of SRSR. They want to suck out the last drop of milk of the half dead cow.