Saturday, December 24, 2016 12:17:57 PM
Could be true. However I assume in Canada like the US the creditors would first need to get a court to help them stop the transfer. In that court they would need to prove that the company owes them which in this case would also expose said creditor to anything they have done wrong in their investment of the property.
I would venture a guess this is why there has been no court help to stop the transfer.
Unless it is not stated that way in the bylaws of the company. I would be fairly sure that a scammer like scott would have a clause that states if a controlling party has more than 50% of the vote the SH meeting is not needed.
When he lost control he allowed them to stick his own clause right up his ass.
Also there are quite a few shares out there that represent a disgruntled shareholder.
People who do not wish for this to work could make it hard with well placed selling.
Notice that every buy at the ask lowers the bid with the ask soon to follow?
Not really there are some sticky points in the way for sure. I don't know if they will pull it off or not. I have my doubts.
But if it fails will Dan tell the shareholders or like Scott, just act like it never happened?
Could be that SRSR also has no issues and IGEX being a scam is the issue.
FEATURED POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM
ECGI Holdings Targets $9.7 Billion Equestrian Apparel Market with Allon Brand Launch • ECGI • Jun 25, 2024 8:36 AM
Avant Technologies Addresses Progress on AI Supercomputer-Driven Data Centers • AVAI • Jun 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Expands International Presence with New Partnership in Dubai • GRLF • Jun 24, 2024 8:30 AM