Who said this, was it Daniel Yazbeck in an interview from 12/6/16?
I assume it was from statements on this board, I did not listen to it but appears there was a link posted here a few times.
Whoever said it the information is blatantly false. From the public filings with the SEC alone anyone can add up that there is WAY more debt to convert coming than 200K.
From the 8-K filed on 12/2/16 alone, four days before 12/6, this debt became live and immediately being sold into the market. 312K worth of debt.
RCP acquired this debt and effected the Section 3(a)(10) exemption improperly IMO to circumvent Rule 144. The nature of these "debts" are nebulous as well.
Suffice to say whatever ones opinion of all that might be it IS CLEAR that more than 200K in convertible debt was left to convert in the immediate and near future.
That was misleading information, at best, from my research.
It is evident that other means of converting current liabilities into discounted free trading shares are being utilized with skeptical, at best, clearing of this debt thru even more suspect means - Effecting Section 3(a)(10) exemptions.
These are calculated transactions between RCP and MYDX. Both parties are agreeing to the "fairness" of the settlements in the Florida county court system, which is a condition of effecting a Section 3(a)(10) exemption.
I question that the "bona fide" debt owed portion of Section 3(a)(10) is legitimate as determined via prior precedents in Section 3(a)(10) cases before the SEC.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.