Its to bad that everything you just stated was a waste of time and here is why lol nice try tho:
I am not the one creating confusion you are:
When you post a sentence from a Washington news article and only this sentence to try and make it look like something its not to push your agenda which is pretty much that NEAH is dog begging the Lab for help to find some mythical results they once had lol this is your trying to mislead not mines but anyways here it is the sentence you try to use to beat around the bush:
With assistance of the national laboratory, Neah Power hopes to identify the changes that need to be made so the practical application matches up with the theoretical modeling.
But when you read the entire article its easy to see that the Theoretical modeling they are talking about is not for the Lab to figure out some lucky results NEAH once came by on accident that they couldnt produce again so they now need help from the lab to figure it out like you guys have been trying to say for the longest. So stop beating around the bush acting like everything you say and try to half quote isnt trying to push that false BS agenda.
This is what you post then if you look at what you have been crying and trying to push this entire time you are trying to imply that the lab is for something different than what it really is. You are trying to push this narrative there is NO ONE OTHER THAN YOU who is trying "to talk around things"
The article you so like to push vividly states what the grant is for: Neah Power Systems was chosen by the U.S. Department of Energy to work with Argonne National Laboratory to increase the capacity and manufacturability of its rechargeable lithium-metal battery.
Notice the words increase but increase from what? It doesnt take a genius to figure it out lol my goodness. Increase from the already five times greater capacity it already does as well the manufacturability which ties into what Argonne actually states on their website with NEAH LMFAO.
Through the SBV Pilot, the company will utilize Argonne National Laboratory staff and expertise to determine the optimal metallization scheme for porous silicon as well as reliable and reproducible processes and insights into possible causes of degradation, capacity fade and dendrite growth.
Notice the word optimal then go back in time when they state that the battery should be producing more than the 5xs it is already producing THAT IS WHAT THE THEORETICAL MODELING is referring to. Getting better results past 5x the capacity it is currently at LMFAO like i said its you trying to push a completely different narrative.
Then they say this: The understanding acquired through the project will improve the manufacturing of the porous silicon, in particular the metallization process. This will help the company achieve target metrics on cost, and performance, and allow longer cycle lifetime for the battery.
BUt wait it gets better smart guy lol you state: There was a slant that was created by D'Couto about having a battery on the cusp, lots of insinuation but no direct commentary on the subject so he is legally in the clear.
So lets be clear then shall we lol he has not had much slant on coming out and saying what product they have and what its capable of have they?? With the police body cam project for sure he didnt come out and just have a slant brief play of words on the matter to be legally in the clear from out right lying as you keep making it seem as if he is doing lol. Or for the last time how about all those other times with all to other things he brings up for sure if he was lying out right he wouldnt be in the clear now would he?? Because most of the time he is coming out and giving some pretty un-slant updates that should not keep him in the claer if he were lying. Get off your high horse.
Again you are exaggerating and making up stuff onw hat you think will happen based on what you hope and dream of happneing not what is actually happening or for better what the actual companies state or imply as on the money with the lab as far as time and personnel even on the Argonne website it says pretty much the project will utilize the Laboratory staff not use A Laboratory scientist. Heck even right after the award was given they stated the main lead on the project for their to be a main lead means there hjas to be other staff ohh my theres that word staff again LMFAO. See this is what you do you dance around stuff as again its NO ONE OTHER THAN YOU who is trying "to talk around things"
But then you do it again with te TRL lol I said all of them meaning from the 1st TRL to the last. And not just pull one sentence out and think you figured it out lol AndI dont just mean taking the brief example of them wI mean what they are actualy for TRL 4 is pretty much saying here is what we have its good to go now it needs testing for an actual application or lets put it this way it needs to be tested in an actual application hmmm Ohh you mean like most of those companies have to do to see hwo they can work with their own tech like the body cam thingamajig LMFAO then look at the TRL 5 description Ohh thats where the actual integrated with more real elements in the case of the body cam it could be within that companies lab testing phase who knows each company is different lol
And all of NEAHs problems dont have to be solved in one year because they are trying to improve what they already have for obvious reasons stated in e grant, in the article you keep referencing and even on Argonnes own website section for NEAH thats all that matters.
So yeah I think I will keep them coming so long as you keep beating around the bush lol
