XNRGI Inc fka NPWZ

[nojay]

O well I am glad you brought that up, so would the Doc be legally in the clear while he comes straight right out and lie to the world about having agreements with other companies and saying that other companies are working to integrate their tech with theirs etc. and say they have this and that?? I would assume one would know the exact reason why I asked this question in sarcastic manner.

(ill give a hint it pretty much calls out and mutes just about every argument/narrative a lot of people have been trying to push for the longest and you pretty much just admitted it by your statement)

And lets no kid ourselves here I have been stating the "stuff takes time logic" for the longest so lets not all of a sudden act like its a new surprise lol just as it will take the lab time it also takes all those companies who have agreements with NEAH to integrate their tech into theirs "AS I HAVE ALSO BEEN saying for the longest. In fact I also point out many times over and over the Doc himself said about aver two and a half years ago that it would be 3 to 5 years before things started going and every time I am met with people ignoring this and trying to change the matter into something else.

And TRL 4 is not basically a science project one needs to actually read all of the TRL's and then look at some of the companies NEAHs has agreements with and see what they have stated they need to do then look back at the DOE TRL's all of them read them thoroughly then look at the grant then look at the first paragraph here then you can easily realize its beyond what you are making it out to be.

With the TRL again you have to read them all not just one they go hand in hand with each other (r feed off each other should I say ina way) its like code you cant just read one line and then expect to understand how all of the rest of the lines of code work that may depend and need things from that one line you read.

Just as with the misleading in someones comments (hmm I cant remember who) who tried to be slick and bring up the Washington news about NEAH and the grant and talk about the Theoretical modeling by only bringing up one sentence that fit their narrative yet somehow forget to mention another different major important sentence within the article that tied both sentences together to explain what the Theoretical modeling was referring to they were talking about that pretty much changed the entire narrative.

You have to see how things work together and thats how I look at things.