New Generation Consumer Group Inc (NGCG)

[john runyon]

Here is the link to prove that your DD is wrong and backwards. It is clear to see that it is not Kims 65 page motion as you have said but it Rupperts 65 page motion which is very clear and with all proofs attached.

https://www.browardclerk.org/Web2/WebForms/Document.aspx?CaseID=ODUzOTEwNw%3d%3d-OydYdHM4HSo%3d&CaseNumber=CACE16008940&Style=Jason+Ruppert%0a++++++++Plaintiff%0a+vs.+%0a%0aNew+Generation+Consumer+Group+Inc%0a++++++++Defendant&FragmentID=MjI4NTEzMzU%3d-9rU6%2fA8wPyU%3d&DtFile=05/25/2016&DocName=Response+to+Motion&PgCnt=65&UserName=&UserType=Anonymous