InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,473.23
(
0.77%
)
US TECH 100
19,397.20
(
1.20%
)
Dow Jones
38,778.10
(
0.49%
)
Brent Oil
83.88
(
2.13%
)
Bitcoin
66,577.14
(
-0.09%
)
Post# of 54032
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

clearmont88

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 5
Posts 488
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/27/2016

clearmont88

Re: A deleted message

Thursday, 11/10/2016 8:47:52 AM

Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:47:52 AM

Post# of 54032
I strongly strongly disagree

Seth is not trading stock or promoting stock. He was trying to make an acquisition last year to create shareholder value after Stella Sung pillaged and virtually bankrupted the company with great efficiency.

Seth immediately lost his ability to raise capitals and rely on Rule 144 upon becoming CEO because Cowan caused the company to lose its fully reporting status. These are called facts

Juries aren't dumb and they will be outraged at the hideous conduct of Cowan Gunteski and heartened at the stand up and honorable nature of Seth Shaw

This is exactly why I am here right now. I see this clearly and any attempt to defend Cowan is very wrong.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up