Wednesday, November 02, 2016 10:03:47 AM
Arguing that there are other forms of 2 factor or multi auth than sfor patents. I provided links to ffiec website guidance on the matter yesterday.
I was argued with about that anyone using mulitifactor has to be infringing on sfor patents. That is not true. there are many forms of multifactor auth. OOB is just one of those, I did say OOB is basically a text back (just trying to get point across) then in classic i hub someone states "nope, ur dumb, not just text, can be a call to".
To go back to my OG statement. OOB is just 1 form of multifactor. Financial institutions utilizing mulitfactor auth are not all infringing on sfor patents.
Recent ZRFY News
- Form NT 10-Q - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-Q or 10-QSB • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/16/2024 07:03:19 PM
ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) Launchs IQ Nano Drone for Commercial Indoor Use • HALO • Oct 10, 2024 8:09 AM
CBD Life Sciences Inc. (CBDL) Targets Alibaba as the Next Retail Giant for Wholesale Expansion of Top-Selling CBD Products • CBDL • Oct 10, 2024 8:00 AM
Foremost Lithium Announces Option Agreement with Denison on 10 Uranium Projects Spanning over 330,000 Acres in the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan • FAT • Oct 10, 2024 5:51 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Reports Significant Progress in Community Relations and Development Efforts in Chachas, Peru • ELEM • Oct 9, 2024 10:30 AM
Unitronix Corp Launches Share Buyback Initiative • UTRX • Oct 9, 2024 9:10 AM
BASANITE INDUSTRIES, LLC RECEIVES U.S. PATENT FOR ITS BASAFLEX™ BASALT FIBER COMPOSITE REBAR AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING • BASA • Oct 9, 2024 7:30 AM