I don't agree it set Nanoco back as their business model was to plan for Cad free
The obvious counter argument to that is that they have not established production sales yet either.
Why not?
Are Nanosys hyperion dots better performing, though they contain cadmium (but still ROHS compliant)?
Or it because some Telly makers think QTMM can supply QD more easily in volume, and therefore more cheaply? But for now, the tech development is behind....? And because the big manufacturing companies are waiting to see prices drop?
Lots of unanswered questions.
CES may tell us more, but my perspective is that new money is going into the supply side chain (for Nanoco that means Merck and Wah Hong) and that is a positive sign of things ahead for all companies.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.