InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 1152
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/27/2016

Re: Mombajack post# 105395

Thursday, 10/20/2016 9:50:05 PM

Thursday, October 20, 2016 9:50:05 PM

Post# of 235042
Would love to see that post since i'm new here. A couple of things, licensing deals are contractual by nature and not the product of any judicial mandate/decision. It's a private party dealing, but can also be as a result of arbitration or simply a product of settlement negotiations. Tying up the court system for a licensing deal implies there was a contract already in place (offer + acceptance + consideration) and that there was a breach....that's why people generally sue. So I'd love to see the context because I don't believe there was a pre-existing licensing deal. But, let's not forget that Kay is a busy man, may have answered a question in a different context, or read a question in a different context, or the biggest reason...was under a NDA. Who know's? But good catch! I'm sure we can solve this mystery. Just giving you my 3 cents. THREE CENTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!SFOR!!!!!!!!!!!!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent ZRFY News