InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 195
Posts 24425
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/03/2010

Re: TC_Trader post# 79529

Tuesday, 10/18/2016 10:01:16 AM

Tuesday, October 18, 2016 10:01:16 AM

Post# of 692398
Investing in private equity companies or companies outside of a given jurisdiction is not the same as prohibitions on penny share investing, and in companies that have taken a hit, whether merited or not, that takes them down so much based upon allegations of mispropriety. There are legal standards he must fit, whether he thought the allegations were serious or not.

Again, the fact that he did not DIVEST says something very strongly. He would have DIVESTED from this investment had he found the Phase V publication substantially credible. He also defended the determination based upon analysis of the SCIENCE.

So again, you fail to make your point. You presume to be able to intuit something from failure to act affirmatively. He already acted very strongly and affirmatively, and he has not taken it back by taking the action that your statement would suggest, DIVESTMENT. So again, alleging his "feelings" from his non-action, is a logical contradiction.

He invests in funds that aren't even on public exchanges. Therefore, this can't be a factor.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News