InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 1459
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/08/2012

Re: slam4202 post# 103087

Monday, 10/17/2016 9:43:19 AM

Monday, October 17, 2016 9:43:19 AM

Post# of 235097
Thank You SLAM - YES DD & Insight

I believe I tend to look at StrikeForce and its Patents a little different than most on the Board given my background in Flight Simulation (F-4E , Apache, Cobra, and BlackHawk) for 14 years and 22 Years working at the Kennedy Space Center/Cape Canaveral working Range Safety at the Range Operations Control Center on MainFrame Computers/Networking.

Working on Cutting Edge Technology along with investing in Emerging Technologies most of my adult life, allows me to evaluate the Potential of a Company like SFOR and Value of it's Patents somewhat different than the average investor. All the longs here can see the Potential, but with a view from a less techical standpoint, I would imagine.

I took a look at SFOR due to the Charts on Youtube in Last half of Sept., who could miss the Green PPS line shooting Straight Up Like a Rocket Launch. Then when I saw the PPS I thought Sub-Penny Stocks don't move that much without Something Big going on. With nothing found about SFOR on the Silicon Investor where I have posted since 1996, I came here to its seemingly Sister Site IHUB. ZPaul's DD gave me a Huge Running Start on DD and instantly Took the SFOR Plunge and have been adding shares ever since. ZPaul's DD allowed me to be able to just concentrate on the indepth Technology Aspect of the Patents whereby my blood began to Flow like Fuel though the Space Shuttle Main Engines, I been researching almost non-stop since then. And My Posts here have been Mainly DD with Links from my point of view.

I have some hesitations in the long run due to my puzzlement over Kay's view of wanting a BuyOut?

But then I don't know at what Value he maybe thinking about, since he has stated he like to Sell, if I have my facts straight.

In what timeframe? I assume in the near Future rather than a Year or more out? But I have not written and asked.
I can see his point of veiw:

The Decade plus history of Building the Company to this Point, Kay maybe ready to retire and relax.

And Technology does Change Quickly, something may come along at anytime and render your Patents Obsolete before the benefit of years of Royalties. But in SFOR's case, I think the Patents will be viable for at least a few Years.

Right now I'm taking a short term approach, looking for the Positive Outcome from the 3 litigates, PR's on Deals, Partnerships and Alliances and Some Company buying SFOR.

Positive moves: I would like to see a share buyback Progarm initiated providing there's a positive outcome on the current 3 lawsuits.

Drawback. Since an entire Encryption Industry has built up with 100's companies infriging, I don't see documentation from SFOR or the CTO on attempting to push forward an IEEE Standard (Intermational Standard) based on SFOR's oob Patents.

Its of little consequence that there is a current non-disclosure with MSFT and we don't know the Full Details Excellent or mediocre, it set a LOUD PRECEDENT for future Lawsuits.

I Look at SFOR as a JUKEBOX at this Moment.
If That Statement does not sound like an emerging Tehnology Investment Statement then listen to this Video considering SFOR is around $0.0169


I Enjoy Rock & Roll, therefore I like SFOR because DAVID HAS TAKEN THE ROCK and ROLLED THE GIANT ! MSFT

Looking for a dime next. See the Video.

Gold 49'er