Cardinal Resources Inc fka CDNL

[tedpeele]

Are you saying you think his ownership is a sign of credibility?

IT could be but it also may not be.

If we assume he owns because the stock is going up, who is to say that's because the company is credible? IF it is a scam, it may be that he anticipates a second leg move up for it soon.


It may be that he is giving the appearance of credibility, while already having sold hundreds of millions of shares when the big rise occurred earlier this year. Without a detailed history of who converted those shares, how can we say one way or another? And it is wasn't him who converted, how do we know it wasn't someone he was working closely with. My perspective at the time was that it looked VERY suspicious that conversions were done RIGHT BEFORE the massive news.

Re the DD comment, sure I could have dug and come up with my own conclusions, but I figure the believers here may have had to rely on nuances/interpretations more than real DD. I really was wanting to know not what I would interpret, but what the believers here interpret.