Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:47:43 PM
By Suevon Lee
Law360, Los Angeles (August 30, 2016, 5:49 PM EDT) -- The Federal Circuit on Tuesday affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision that Veritas Technologies Inc.'s data restoration patent was obvious due to prior art, but reversed its decision not to allow amendment of claims, saying the denial was “arbitrary and capricious.”
In a ruling sure to turn heads in the patent law world, a three-judge panel remanded the case to the board to determine the patentability of the two proposed claims, saying the denial of amendment was erroneous despite the outcome of a pending full Federal Circuit ruling on Aqua Product Inc.'s challenge of PTAB procedures for amending patents in America Invents Act reviews.
“We do not see how the board could reasonably demand more from Veritas in this case,” wrote Circuit Judge Richard G. Taranto regarding the PTAB’s grounds for denial based on Veritas’ failure to address whether each newly added feature in the two new proposed claims, when not combined with each other, was separately known in the prior art.
Swiss information technology company Veeam Software Corp. sought inter partes review under the AIA of five claims of Veritas’ U.S. Patent No. 7,024,527, which relates to a mechanism that prioritizes data restoration sought by an active application during the course of computer data restoration so that application does not have to wait for a file to be fully restored before accessing the file.
After the PTAB instituted its review, Veritas, which merged with Symantec Corp. in 2005, filed a conditional motion to amend the patent to add two new claims narrowing the scope of the patent in the event the board eventually found the challenged claims to be invalid.
These new claims would narrow the claim scope from a broader “block-level” data restoration to a more restrictive “file-level” restoration not anticipated by prior art, the company asserted.
In an April 2015 decision, the board rejected the challenged claims for obviousness and also dismissed Veritas’ motion to amend based on the sole ground that the Mountain View, California-based firm didn’t state how the features in the two new claims were independently known in the prior art.
The board’s conclusion that the ‘527 patent was unpatentable was left undisturbed by the Federal Circuit Tuesday, which affirmed its reasoning and found no fault with its broadest-reasonable-interpretation standard.
“Although the ‘527 patent gives indications that the contemplated restore application operates at the file level, the indications here are not enough under the broadest-reasonable-interpretation standard to exclude block-level restoration,” the court said.
However, it reversed the denial of amendment under a review of the Administrative Procedures Act that permits reversal if action is “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law,” according to the opinion.
The Federal Circuit made sure to point out that it wasn’t making any determination on whether the two new proposed claims were “properly construed as limited to a background program operating at the file level or what arguments are open to the parties on that question.”
It stated that the board merely held Veritas to a seemingly unreachable standard by requiring it to first address whether the features of the two claims would be independently known from prior art.
The court noted how “a long line of Supreme Court and Federal Circuit cases” have held that “novel and nonobvious inventions often are only a combination of known individual features.”
“In this case, we fail to see how describing the combination is meaningfully different from describing what is new about the proposed claims, even in comparison to the unamended claims,” the court said.
It added that the court’s denial was wrong independent of the resolution of In re Aqua Products Inc., the case pending en banc review in the Federal Circuit, oral arguments for which are set for Dec. 9.
The difficulty of amending claims in AIA reviews has been one of the more contentious topics in patent law since the proceedings became available in 2012. Patent owners have complained that the board has made it nearly impossible to secure claim amendments, which are a key tool for saving patents from invalidity challenges.
Byron Pickard, an attorney with Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox PLLC who is representing Veeam, told Law360 Tuesday the court's affirmance should block any remaining infringement suit Veritas has against Veeam.
“We are pleased that court affirmed the board’s obviousness rulings," Pickard said. "As a result, Symantec has no remaining patent claims asserted against Veeam, and there is no reason for the litigation to continue.”
A representative for Veritas declined to comment on Tuesday.
In addition to Judge Taranto, Circuit Judges Alan D. Lourie and Kathleen O’Malley sat on the panel.
The patent-in-suit is U.S. Patent No. 7,024,527.
Veritas is represented by K. Lee Marshall, Joseph J. Richetti and Alexander David Walden of Bryan Cave LLP.
Veeam is represented by Byron Leroy Pickard, Mark Fox Evans, Lori A. Gordon, Michael Q. Lee and Daniel S. Block of Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox PLLC.
USPTO Director Michelle K. Lee, an intervenor, is represented by Meredith Hope Schoenfeld, Thomas W. Krause, Scott Weidenfeller, Robert McBride and Molly R. Silfen of the USPTO’s Office of the Solicitor.
The case is Veritas Technologies LLC v. Veeam Software Corporation, No. 15-1894 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
—Additional reporting by Ryan Davis. Editing by Kelly Duncan.
Recent IDCC News
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/06/2024 08:06:54 PM
- InterDigital Announces Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 05/02/2024 12:30:08 PM
- InterDigital awarded injunction against Lenovo • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 05/02/2024 12:30:00 PM
- InterDigital’s Doug Castor Elected Co-Chair of the ATIS Next G Alliance Steering Group • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/29/2024 08:00:00 AM
- New Report Pins 6G Success on Novel Benchmarks Extending Beyond Speed, Latency, and Mobility • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/25/2024 08:00:00 AM
- InterDigital Announces Date for First Quarter 2024 Financial Results • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/19/2024 12:30:00 PM
- InterDigital and Concordia University Announce Research Collaboration on AI-enabled Immersive Media Delivery over 5G Networks • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/15/2024 08:00:00 AM
- InterDigital Announces Convertibility of 3.50% Senior Convertible Notes Due 2027 • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/04/2024 12:30:00 PM
- InterDigital to Showcase Innovations in High Definition and Sustainable Video Streaming Alongside Partners at NAB 2024 • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/26/2024 08:00:00 AM
- InterDigital Declares Regular Quarterly Cash Dividend • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/20/2024 08:30:00 PM
- InterDigital’s Xiaofei Wang Appointed Chair of the IEEE 802.11 Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AIML) Standing Committee • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/20/2024 08:00:00 AM
- Interdigital to Speak at the 36th Annual Roth Conference • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/11/2024 12:30:00 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/06/2024 09:58:21 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/05/2024 09:03:32 PM
- InterDigital’s Atle Monrad Elected Chair of 3GPP’s SA6 Working Group • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/05/2024 09:00:00 AM
- InterDigital Honors Wireless and Video Innovation Leaders Michael Starsinic and Fabrice Le Léannec as Inventors of the Year • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 02/22/2024 09:30:00 PM
- Keysight and InterDigital to Demonstrate AI in 6G Systems at Mobile World Congress 2024 • Business Wire • 02/21/2024 04:00:00 PM
- At MWC, InterDigital to Showcase Innovation Empowering Connected Experiences ‘At Work, At Rest, and At Play’ • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 02/19/2024 09:00:00 AM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/15/2024 01:37:02 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/15/2024 01:33:18 PM
- InterDigital Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2023 Financial Results • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 02/15/2024 01:30:36 PM
- U.S. Futures Edge Higher Ahead of Key Economic Data Release, Oil Prices See Modest Declines • IH Market News • 02/15/2024 11:35:32 AM
- InterDigital and Broadpeak Announce Collaboration on MPEG V3C Standardized Content Distribution At Scale • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 02/13/2024 09:00:00 AM
- InterDigital appoints Ken Kaskoun as Chief Growth Officer • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 02/12/2024 01:30:00 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/07/2024 01:43:10 PM
Avant Technologies Engages Wired4Tech to Evaluate the Performance of Next Generation AI Server Technology • AVAI • May 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM