InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 259
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/10/2016

Re: Turtle65 post# 18689

Wednesday, 09/28/2016 10:44:38 PM

Wednesday, September 28, 2016 10:44:38 PM

Post# of 34575
One question though Turtle. It confuses me that you classify all of the reverse split companies into one - 90% group.

But if the science is with $TPIV and the company proves successful, then why would that prevent investors from investing in a good stock?

Are you saying that just because $TPIV went through a reverse split that they are doomed regardless of the potential science breakthrough(s) and the potential for investors to make big $?

Would an investor refuse to invest in a $TPIV stock that is soaring through the roof simply because they went through a reverse split?

Or maybe i misunderstood what you meant. I took it as lumping all companies together and claiming they have a 90% chance of falling through the floor. That kind of thinking could cost you a lot of money. To me that is "inside the box thinking". Gotta be an "outside the box" thinker and be able to analyze things on a much more intellectual level.

Please clarify.
Thanks.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent MRKR News