InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 3613
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/28/2009

Re: stockdarockk post# 85011

Wednesday, 09/28/2016 2:32:48 PM

Wednesday, September 28, 2016 2:32:48 PM

Post# of 334171
I, of course, disagree with that entire statement. The labeling requirements were something that came up from their meetings, after the FDA opened the door to the new possibility of a 510(k) after all. If that is indeed the case, as I believe and you don't, then they would then move and only then--on what was needed for labeling. The FDA wasn't even thinking about clearing the product before and wouldn't spend a minute of time in that phase of the process. Period.