'moimeme'? it wasn't all panic selling, many were trip holders caching in on the candy!
However in some sense, it's not only expected, whereas yesterday's stock prices did spike up pretty high quite quickly, (relatively speaking), but also quite healthy.
In addition, SFOR's strategically slow increase in stock price, (overall), is/was not only clever, but also allows for all exchanges of hands (Buyers-vs-sellers) to consolidate each other out! Which in effect, better stabilizes SFOR's legs up.
Finally, there are two ways to flush out large chunk flippers and the so-called, "weak hands" , this is done by the orchestrated Spikes and Deep Dips, respectively. The victors are typically the steady accumulators and long term holders, as the aforementioned are more likely to become the typical stock price chasers.
Another benefit of slow stock increases, is that it minimizes/lowers the quantity of Fly-By-Flippers.
The higher the stock price goes the deeper the pockets required to achieve flips that are monetarily worth the time and efforts.
This is why these Pinksheet-style flippers seldom ever go after APPLE, GOOGLE, MICROFOFT and other heavyweight champions.
Only the BIG-DOGS dare enter the ring with those guys.
(and why their stock prices are relatively more stable, accordingly)
Because everyone's selling/buying exit/entry points/prices are all different, it's unfair to tort players for their trading actions!
where sells, may likely be their selling point in accordance to when they bought!
Where one buys, may likely be at the peek of a spike.
it's only timing and everyone plays at different times!
However likewise in the case with SFOR, its trends, (according to what seems to be a growing demand for its genre of products), is quite possible of rising several folds higher by year's end when compared to its current position.
(But in spite of SFOR's green lights, nothing is guaranteed)
In understanding the Risks!, I don’t mind losing in stocks that died TRYING, but I DO mind losing in stocks that died LYING!
