Friday, September 23, 2016 6:01:40 PM
A more telling reality is that Google is using the technology, patented it under their name (I guess they didn't feel it was invalid), and the technolgy has not yet been superceded.
Patent law and idea theft is very complex, and not limited to an awarded patent.
I believe Female Executive claimed that MAXD was only authorized to sue for trademark infringement. What trademark? Does anyone even know what the trademark is? If one does exist, what has Google gained from it? I'm personally unaware of anyone who uses the Google video products because they recognize and prefer a VSL/Vedanti trademark. As such, I can see the trademark being invalid.
FEATURED NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM