It is VERY CLEAR that these attacks against $CDNL & its CEO, have been wrenched up, since nobody believed or were worried about the previous attacks that centered around USAR/Vast Mtn. for the simple reason it lacked any factual data to support it and was an attempt by a USAR/Vast Mtn. shareholder to try and even the score.
Now they are getting even more desperate by trying to link anything and everything they can dream up to try and link it to CDNL & its CEO. Why would anyone believe any of this malarky when they lack any factual evidence to support these wild assumptions they come up with? Fact is, the market hasn't believed it, nor will they believe this new crap being spewed on social media.
Anyone who has closely followed CDNL, knows that this all stems from an incident over 12 years ago, when an investor who was stupid enough to invest everything into USAR/Vast Mtn. and lost everything when USAR/Vast Mtn. was found guilty of a securities fraud scheme. 12 years later, they are still trying every angle to try to even the score! Unfortunately, CDNL has provided them a new audience to keep the story alive, due to previous and current business relationships where CDNL was hired or contracted to provide a service. Despite the fact that after a long SEC investigation into the USAR/Vast Mtn. incident, CDNL, nor its CEO, were ever mentioned as being a party to this incident, which is why everything they assume and post should be ignored by everyone.
They will NEVER let go of this, as they spend EVERY SINGLE DAY attacking USAR/Vast Mtn. in any way possible! The more they can engage about the USAR/Vast Mtn. incident, the more they keep the story alive. If ignored, they would seek another avenue to use in their lifelong quest to get even. I have tried again and again to put this issue to rest with the facts, only to have them keep it alive with nothing more than crazy assumptions!
Today could be the day we see an update from Kevin - Cheers!
PS: Thx 777 for forwarding my last post to Kevin & I too addressed this in my message to Kevin. The more shareholders demand answers to these issues, the more the likelihood he will respond.
