All SEC rules have relevance, hence their creation.
The question is how is this particular rule relevant to SFOR? There has been ABSOLUTELY ZERO proof, or even collaborative suspicion of recent promotion, disclosed or otherwise.
No change in the OS confirmed practically daily by IHUB members to the point of ad nauseam. This is further verified by the last two 10Qs.
In penny land, accustomed to fluff PRs and hopes and dreams, this group has put together amazing DD and is (im)patently waiting for confirmation from a company that has been incredibly stingy with PRs as of late as the company plan comes to fruition.
Perhaps this is an appropriate time for all to familiarize themselves with another SEC Rule...240.10b-5
§ 240.10b-5 Employment of manipulative and deceptive devices.
It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails or of any facility of any national securities exchange,
(a) To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud,
(b) To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or
(c) To engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person,
in connection with the purchase or sale of any security.
(Sec. 10; 48 Stat. 891; 15 U.S.C. 78j)
[13 FR 8183, Dec. 22, 1948, as amended at 16 FR 7928, Aug. 11, 1951]
