InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 1883
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/22/2016

Re: None

Thursday, 09/01/2016 12:32:55 PM

Thursday, September 01, 2016 12:32:55 PM

Post# of 109742
This is without a doubt the dumbest thing IR has posted to date.

They want to use the 85 million dollar loan that congress wont even pass for cash. EX-M bank will not loan 85 million for just any reason LMAO

And it still doesnt resolve the issue of the share structure regardless if they get the loan or not.

Greetings

First, let me give you a new conscious thought; hold what you know about PPS.

Ready your mind to this...Everyone knows retained earnings/cash on hand is the key to a stable stock.

Let’s start with the mindset……. a reverse split isn't going to happen but a buy back may not happen either.

You’re probably saying to yourselves, "this is just crazy".

Here Me Out

One of the chief reasons TPAC hasn’t taken the 10M loan is because at some point they can use 85 million dollars to increase their IPPS.

Remember, we are not the same company of 2014/ 2015; we have drastically changed in 2016.

We moved from manufacturer to service provider with two distinct lines of service.

What does that has to do with the IPPS?

If you take the 85M loan and have nothing else to do with it we can place it at the floor….cash on hand.

We gave the shareholders this outlook and formula in the beginning.

Now here is the formula for IPPS:
Retained earnings - dividends/Outstanding Shares

We have no dividend so let’s run the numbers.

85M from loan moves to MRVB as cash on hand, Retained Earning/Total OS, 4B rounded up just for easy calculations = .021 (now this is before any share reduction ). Just based on the loan becoming cash on hand the IPPS value goes sky-high.

The 52 week high is .0072, the loan can automatically propel the stock price pass the 52 week high……

We are looking at things in a different light.

So just with the full loan from EX IM we could carry out this, maybe an EIA’s retained earnings in a calendar year can trigger it, note the word TRIGGER.

The difference 90 days ago, the loan was to be used to acquire facilities and increase manufacturing output, today all that has changed thru SLA and LA we don’t have those needs .

WE DON’T HAVE THE SAME FINANCIAL NEEDS AND WE DON’T HAVE DEBT

TPAC can channel its money elsewhere……. no better place than the MRVB as cash on hand.
TPAC would never have to do any other business and it would grow just off interest, which is REVENUE.

Add the MRVB and BTL, as long as they are in effect the IPPS grows AUTOMATICALLY.

We don’t and won’t express more information on the teams, just come to know TPAC has an A-TEAM. Their financial backgrounds in WALLSTREET and experiences in GLOBAL MARKETS & MARKETING are brining a NEW twist to TPAC.

Their goal is to build stability creating self-adjusting self regenerating systems that allow TPAC to become a prime business in the global landscape.

The company is the key.

We build the company the stock will follow, not the other way around.

This is the best way to raise the IPPS without taking from the ShareHolder. These teams are business builders providing CEO Bill McKay with top methodologies that you won’t find in other OTC businesses.

Thanks to CEO Bill McKay, his company framework makes it easier to implement changes at a rapid pace.

If you have any other questions let me know, if you don’t mind we like to use your email and provide this information directly to the TPAC share holders as well.

No Market Maker can manipulate IPPS.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.