InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 1298
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/16/2007

Re: deafelephant post# 32860

Monday, 08/29/2016 1:39:17 PM

Monday, August 29, 2016 1:39:17 PM

Post# of 54032
Good answer Deaf, however if someone is raising money for the company to fight the legal matters I am all for it. Over time it will be a successful . This will be a good thing. I would prefer to have more shares OutStanding rather than have TAUG go belly up. RESTRICTED SHARES cannot be sold under RULE 144 until 6 months up to 1 year of ownership. Anyone holding RESTRICTED SHARES are betting on the companies success over the long term. If the company is awarded several million dollars in the lawsuit TAUG can buy back many shares in the open market at this very low price. This will reduce the total OS. Consultants at times might have had an option to to get paid by the hour or take equity. The shares they own amount to nothing until the company becomes a winner.
How many of you on the message board would work for any company and for no compensation at all?

TIC TOC TIC TO WHAT TO DO
BLACKCAT

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.