InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 30
Posts 3402
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/25/2016

Re: vanwes1 post# 94949

Friday, 08/26/2016 11:24:02 PM

Friday, August 26, 2016 11:24:02 PM

Post# of 232822

.Thanks but nowhere in any of my statements do I ever say that he has access to our intellectual property. It was purely conjecture on your part to assume that that's what I meant. However it is a fair assumption to believe that Li will exploit his ability to manufacture liquid metal parts at our detriment due to the fact that he doesn't have to worry about licensing being his only means of generating money. Unlike liquid metal that can't manufacture anything.



A) I don't believe in "conjecture" - only facts, sir

B) I never assume anything, sir

C) He entered this deal either for the ip or to make money on the stock. That's hardly altruistic. And who said he was looking to make anything on "licensing"? Not me. Ya got the wrong fella, fella.

I'm up 61% at the close!!!

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News