InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 68
Posts 5584
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/13/2012

Re: fuente post# 82442

Thursday, 08/25/2016 12:52:53 PM

Thursday, August 25, 2016 12:52:53 PM

Post# of 329056
Good post - shows wisdom - The questions one may ask with respect to the BIEL financing model are so simple:

Was there nefarious intent? No
Was there secret personal financial gain? No
Was the BOD aware and supportive? Yes
Were shareholders aware and supportive? Yes
Was the financing model information available to all shareholders? Yes - website
Was outside financial counsel aware and supportive? Yes
Was the financing model successful in advancing the business? Yes
Was the financing model a one-time phenomenon? No
How long was the financing model used? Years
Was the SEC misled by an outside legal counsel contractor who lied about being an accredited Member of the Bar? Yes
Was that crook already a convicted felon? Yes
Was he terminated by BIEL the second his misrepresentation became known? Yes
Was he tossed out without receiving compensation because of his fraud? Yes
Was he angry, vindictive and revengeful? Yes
Did the SEC buy the spiteful complaint about BIEL? Yes, for a while
Did BIEL knowingly flout any law or regulations? No
I believe these are the logical questions a prudent person asks.

How do I know these things, how am I so comfortable? Because I did the work to obtain details and assess the situation as a business issue, so as to protect my investment.

As you posted - "Double...whatever....coming" is well stated by you and means - Double clearance - NHS, UK, universal healthcare tariff addition of BIEL's RecoveryRx AND USA, 510(k), Clearance for OTC sales of ActiPatch a.k.a. Double Tsunami . . . .soon