InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 61
Posts 9563
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/29/2015

Re: kabunushi post# 69813

Sunday, 08/14/2016 11:31:58 AM

Sunday, August 14, 2016 11:31:58 AM

Post# of 701203
You understood my point perfectly, and I believe it is very possible that Mr. Feuerstein is motivated by the same type of thinking that has impelled the actions of people throughout history from the inquisitors in 16th century Spain to prosecutors like Mr. Nifong the prosecutor in the infamous Duke Lacrosse case.

This kind of thinking is dangerous and a slippery slope that any journalist or investigator can fall into.

Once you have decided that someone or some group is evil, the tendency to become highly biased in your investigative work and the presentation of the facts is hard to avoid and it is a short step from there to willfully distorting or in some cases simply manufacturing evidence.

For example, it was Mr. Feuerstein who manufactured the rebuke from MD Anderson. He did not cover a story, he created a story and caused a rift between a company sponsoring a cancer trial and its partner.


Also, when Mr. Feuerstein called Dr. Buzdar he did not do anything to see whether Dr. Buzdar was right in saying that MD Anderson and partner companies had historically released information similar to that Ms. Powers had been sharing about the DCVax Direct Phase 1 trial.

That omission is a willful distortion especially since unpaid message board commentators easily found out that releasing information about Phase 1 trials was pretty standard with respect to MD Anderson not to mention the phramaceutical industry in general. Mr. Feuerstein simply took Dr. Buzdar's word that NWBO was in the wrong because it supported his prejudice against the company.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News