InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 840
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/21/2008

Re: rekcusdo post# 347512

Thursday, 07/28/2016 3:17:00 PM

Thursday, July 28, 2016 3:17:00 PM

Post# of 797139
They did not act as a receiver as that would have entailed very specific steps leading to liquidation of assets, even under the cloud of a conservatorship.

What they did is off the books. It was neither a conservatorship nor a receivership.

It was a scheme called limbo where there is a perennial status quo. A semi-conservatorship turned from temporary to a permanent status as the companies cannot exit.

In other words, a de-facto nationalization without the name.

Thus, HERA should not apply. Hopefully, the courts will agree with me too :)