InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 253
Posts 2747
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/15/2006

Re: Desperado90 post# 455609

Thursday, 07/14/2016 4:48:25 PM

Thursday, July 14, 2016 4:48:25 PM

Post# of 734762
Do supply the report. There was a project fillmore which was to transfer some 20 billion to the holding company which did not. transpire because of the fdic seizure. There was a fight over a 4 billion deposit owed to the holding company, so the other 16 billion although maybe not a deposit was nevertheless a liability to the holding company which never had to be paid back. And wmbfsb had other depository liability as well. The point I was making was that although jpm assumed 180 billion in deposit liabity, jpm really only was on the hook for 140 billion. So you think jpm took on a 140 billion of deposit liability without getting loans in the deal?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News