InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 2649
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/28/2013

Re: sentiment_stocks post# 64674

Thursday, 06/16/2016 5:36:03 PM

Thursday, June 16, 2016 5:36:03 PM

Post# of 703841
I might be missing your point, or repeating what you are getting at, but:

1) If the data from the rapids is compelling, as it reportedly is
2) If the data from the rapids is so compelling that the fact that their info arm has no control group doesn't matter...
3) If then the only hole in that rapid progressor data is the possibility that a bunch of pseudoes got in there...
4) But if the combined rapids + pseudos is so compelling that the fact that the rapids did not have a control arm doesn't matter...

Then maybe the group they might be looking for approval on is simply the early progressors, without regard to whether they are rapid or pseudo.

If so, that would simplify things a great deal.

Not saying this is likely, just putting it out there for debate by the people that would see the holes, such as you Sentiment, and others.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News