You claimed Breitling had only been around for six to eight years. You were wrong. You claimed they have been public for at least five. Also wrong.
I claimed that Breitling Oil and Gas had been around for six to eight years with no known innovation and I claimed that CF had been in the industry for 10 years. I said six or eight years because I was not sure CF was including the Oklahoma LLC in the "innovative" company. I also claimed that the corporation that is now called Breitling Energy existed for at least 5 years, which is absolutely true and documented by the SEC and presumably by the Secretary of State of Utah.
When you completely freaked out and said I didn't understand how a reverse merger worked, I qualified what I said similar to above. I then pointed out that a reverse merger, virtually by definition, involved a pre-existing public corporation, you again said I was wrong, which I wasn't. Do you think reverse mergers involve pre-existing public corporations? Yes or no will do.
When you continued on with this non-sense and said I owed BECC an apology, I apologized for stating that they had been around for six or eight years without coming up with an innovation when in fact they had been around for 10 without coming up with an innovation. What in the world do you want, to just come out and lie?
I have already said that it is silly to assume Breitling’s age based on an archived website
Had I done that, you might have a point.
It is ironic that while you claim Breitling lacks any claim to innovation, it was Faulkner’s computer hosting and programming experience that lead to his own 3D seismic imaging software that seemed to be successful for Faulkner early in the company’s history.
There is no evidence that CF has any programming experience. There is no evidence that he developed any 3D interpretation software. Even in early interviews he was careful to avoid stating that he did, while insinuating that he did. Nonetheless, you just made up the above statement, which is, I suppose,exactly the kind of statements CF has hoped for, people making up positive things about him.
Your claims of lack of innovations came later and I ignored them because I didn't feel it was relevant to the topic of the thread.
I think your memory fails you. Nonetheless, I asked for anyone to come up with any innovation do back up the claim of innovation. No one did.
As long as you pin this nonsense to the top of the board, I will point out how mindless it is. Get used to it.
