Well, I certainly never planned to post as much as I did/do on this stock. My other picks are more in line with my style. :)
But, I also know everyone here for a while, and obviously like to share due diligence. Keep in mind that there's been a lot of Company drama, and my nephew having been in the study, I'm wanting to see the outcome of the science. It probably was not a good idea that I invested in the first place but I know more about this disease than most. I do think there's a very good chance of success on OS. But, because I really dislike management's leadership "invest with blind faith" style, and their prior tendency to only report the inflated positive side of things, but failed to make it clear all the risks, I have to protect myself, and not be dumb about going heavy on my own risk tolerance. It's horrible to read how heavily invested some are on this board, and read the pain in some of the post. Folks stand to lose a lot if the science doesn't pull through. And the Company has been horrible to their investors, which is ultimately why the share price is so low and has over corrected IMO. They caused the loss of shareholder confidence, by keeping their shareholders in the dark over things that could be covert on (COI dealings for one). Plus, the carrot on a stick, "stay tuned" messaging, and then going silent is not ever good for a stock, it actually makes management look more suspect. I absolutely hate that. I don't think they've done anything illegal, but they certainly have not thought about their investors money. So at the end of the day, me not trusting management's style, well my risk are appropriate. If positive news comes in on the science, and it makes me reconsider taking more risk, then I will. But never will I invest the $100K in them that I once did due to current management.
