Tauriga Sciences Inc (fka TAUG)

[Blackcat7717]

DID ANYONE READ THIS$$$$$$$$$
I guess several shareholders do not want to make a score.

The lawsuit has not been amended and Cowan has not answered . If it is not amended we can do a dirivitive.

Here is one of the emails I sent to Cowan - they have also committed what I think is extortion not returning the papers.

Are ALL Cowan Shareholders Liable, Maybe Criminal - Civil?
Hey there, its me again. Are you screwing your employees by keeping them in the dark like you did management of Tauriga? Shouldn't your employees know what's coming!

Federal Pacer Website - View Complaint https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/9866482/Tauriga_Sciences,_Inc_v_Cowan,_Gunteski__Co,_PA_et_al

Shareholders of Cowan, in addition to filing the complaint with NJ Attorney General, New Jersey Board of Accountancy and the PCAOB, what do you think about Tauriga shareholders sending a signed letter to the Federal Judge hearing this case asking her to refer this matter to the Florida Attorney General criminal division? A referral from a Federal Judge to the Attorney General would carry weight.

I hope Tauriga wins a 100 million dollars against Cowan with punitive damages, to set an example to other auditors. But that does not compensate shareholders you screwed directly. You scumbags should congratulate yourselves, because you have positioned yourself to be one of a few companies that meet the bar of being a defendant in a third-party shareholder class-action suit. Not to mention leaving yourself to be sued personally. Don't take my word for it, I have a couple relationships with big class action attorneys and they have pointed out third-party shareholder suits that they were successful winning. Your actions were a deliberate, pre-meditated, intentional and designed to harm Tauriga shareholders. If the insurance adjuster and supervisor were "in on it", as I believe,, they won a seat to be co-defendants with you. Punitive damages are not the norm in class actions, but once again, you dipshits managed to meet the bar for punitive damages as well.

Let's have a quick recap;

1. The reason why the shareholders have a standing to sue Cowan as a third party shareholder lawsuit is because you deliberately set out to destroy the company and the share price causing the stock to virtual cease trading and drop to a tenth of a penny.

2. The reason why we can sue each shareholder personally is because shareholders of Cowan actions in failing to return Tauriga's working papers so far out of the norm of decency and standard practices, in addition to the shareholders of Cowan deliberately setting out to destroy shareholders of Tauriga.

In bet some of you shareholders have some nice personal assets eh. Houses, retirement accounts ect..

How many scotches do you Cowan shareholders swig down at the 19th hole of the clubhouse, laughing about how you screwed over Tauriga shareholders? You think your only loss in this matter will be an insurance deductible? Are you dirtbags laughing now?

Here are just a few questions I think about;
- How many, and which shareholders or Directors of Cowan participated in the decision to refuse to return Tauriga's working papers? What date shareholder meeting occur and are the minutes memorialized? OR, Did the managing partner conceal to other Cowan shareholders that he was refusing to give Tauriga its working papers back despite numerous requests?

- Who, if any other persons, advised Shareholders at Cowan to REFUSE to return Tauriga's work papers. Include attorney's and insurance adjusters in this conspiracy to deprive Tauriga its work papers.

- Why weren't the working papers returned immediately to try to mitigate these damages done to Tauriga and its thousands of shareholders?

- Why wasn't all ill-gotten fees Cowan charged Tauriga returned immediately to mitigate the damages done by your malpractice, so that Tauriga could hire another auditor. The de-listing crippled Tauriga fund raising ability.

- Why didn't the shareholders of Cowan immediately assist the new auditor with rectifying the filing error and assist Tauriga in uplisting? Oh, that's right I know the answer, it's because you JACK AZZES didn't return Tauriga's working papers.

- When was Cowan's malpractice insurance carrier advised that Tauriga requested the working papers? Who were the adjusters, managers or legal inside the malpractice carrier that knew that Tauriga's working papers were being requested returned?

An auditing firm has a fiduciary responsibility. An insurance company has certain basic responsibilities when adjusting a claim. Seems logical that if my house burned down by an arsonist with insurance coverage the insurance carrier would want to mitigate damages as much as possible, and not throw gasoline on the fire. Even if certain valuations needed appraisers to evaluate the claim, at the very least the insurance carrier could have done here was to advance funds against the final claim so that Tauriga could hire another auditor. Seems to me the insurance carrier would want to mitigate its liability by directing Cowan to return the working papers of Tauriga and assist Tauriga in every way possible in getting whole, including assisting in restoring Tauriga's filing status. That is unless they wanted to use refusing to return Tauriga's working papers as a weapon. Tauriga had to file a federal lawsuit just to get it's papers returned.

I have no doubt, whether a jury in a punitive damage case or a jury in a criminal case will see the actions taken by Cowan, and Cowan's malpractice carrier as a horrific act of CRIMINAL EXTORTION.


Real people lost real money. The stock was as high as $.30 at one time and even though it was only around a penny at the time of the listing you drove it down to a 10th of a penny. Seth did not have a chance to do another merger because 15 days after he became CEO, TAUG was delisted. The value of the stock including market and share price fluctuate. Each time the Company had some kind of a merger the stock price rose. It is a given that the delisting has damaged the CEOs relationship with hedge funds and investor groups. Did you ever think to give Tauriga shareholders a letter of apology so that CEO Seth Shaw, only 15 days into being a CEO, wouldn't be labeled a scam artist. No, you only cared about protecting yourselves.

I suppose all the Cowan shareholders will be deposed as the trial date nears, but it will be much better if they are answering questions to the State Police or FBI.

The cover-up is always bigger than the crime. I wouldn't be surprised if a few scumbags at Cowan are taken out in handcuffs, along with whatever dopes were giving you legal or insurance advice on the strategy to withhold the working papers from Tauriga.

If a jury gives Tauriga a bigger judgment than your insurance coverage ( a given in my humble opinion as Hulk Hogaan was just awarded 140 million and that did not involve thousands of shareholders, malpractice and extortion), I suppose your bonuses and raises at Cowan will be effected, eh. Press releases are coming, and every prospective client that Google searches your Company's name as well as the Company's shareholders names will be seeing this lawsuit, censure and press releases. Not returning the Company's working papers was not only outrageous, I think it rises to criminal extortion, I have no doubt a jury will feel the same way.

Wouldn't it be a hoot if all of you pleaded the fifth in your depositions. I wonder how many of Cowan's shareholders know what they have done could be criminal. Well, the shareholders of Cowan will be deposed soon and in January they will be testifying in front of a jury. I wonder if many of Cowan shareholders were left in the dark? Meyler has one foot on a banana peel and the other one out the door anyway. I know Cowan knew. Conspiracy to extort a public Company into accepting a fractional settlement by refusing to return said Company's working papers after committing malpractice is not the kind of thing that looks good on a resume.

Hmmmm....

I see you are trying to block your employees from getting emails. Good luck with that. You haven't learned a thing have you. Are you trying to hide from your employees the actions you you committed which escalated this litigation? Ha. Deja Vu - just like you concealed from Tauriga that you were being investigated for the 2014 financials yet you kept right on billing Tauriga into 2015. How is blocking the emails working out for you? Not so good, eh. Don't your employees deserve to know what is going on, or do you want them to be in the dark until the day a few of the shareholders are possibly walked out in handcuffs or possibly lose tens of millions in litigation.

No limitation on punitive damages in Florida, OOUCH. Cowan shareholders have nice low hanging fruit to collect from including; houses, bank and stock accounts and retirement accounts. Your actions were despicable.

Doesn't matter about you trying to block the emails anyway as their employees home addresses are available. But if any employee does not want an occasional update they can opt out and that will be respected. I am pretty much done for now.

P.S.

One more thing, our shareholder group has quite percentage of outstanding Tauriga shares, we want this case to go to a jury and therefore may also file a shareholder derivative suit. We want jury to hear the agony and anguish of shareholders. We want to know why the papers were not returned and who was responsible. We want the jury the hear the anguish, stress and humiliation CEO Seth Shaw was needlessly put through.