InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 2649
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/28/2013

Re: sentiment_stocks post# 63252

Sunday, 05/29/2016 9:47:05 PM

Sunday, May 29, 2016 9:47:05 PM

Post# of 705558
"But I do suspect the screening halt was initiated by the sponsor."

I have thought that was probably the case for some time. Also hoped that was the case. But you reposted the relevant statements from the 10K this morning. Those statements seem to clearly indicate that the hold is not by the sponsor. That is how I read them anyway. I don't want to reprint them because they are kind of scary, and a big part of why I flopped for a while today. Not that they are new, but they hit hard this morning for some reason. Maybe in conjunction with your arguments that the hold could be imposed by the regulators.

But as I said; though my "experience" is pretty much reading posts on this message board, I don't think the regulators often hold for futility. I think that is usually the sponsor. And again, the 10K language seems to be clear that this hold was not called by the sponsor.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News