InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 77
Posts 3849
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/17/2003

Re: Pyrrhonian post# 61291

Wednesday, 05/11/2016 4:59:46 PM

Wednesday, May 11, 2016 4:59:46 PM

Post# of 714850

Who else would do suing NWBO and agree to that?



Right, this has to be Woodford because you think it is. Great evidence supported only by your belief:

Who would do that except Woodford?

It's one plaintiff. That plaintiff agreed with the defending to file a joint motion to hold off on the lawsuit until the investigation is complete.



You think that nobody else would want to limit their court costs by having the benefit of receiving a third party's official investigation report into the whole range of things they claim, instead of paying their attorney to independently cover the same ground to try to prove malfeasance? Or wouldn't want to enjoy having that report in their back pocket when they go to depose the people they're suing?

You think that whatever you imagine has to be the case, arguing only on your own authority. Yet your imagination is very limited. That seems to be a clear pattern with you.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News