InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 834
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/19/2014

Re: Rkmatters post# 59752

Tuesday, 04/26/2016 1:36:50 PM

Tuesday, April 26, 2016 1:36:50 PM

Post# of 700702
I find it interesting that in your long winded explanation where you "disagree with me" you point out numerous flaws and errors made by OP, identifying that they eventually withdrew from the consulting engagement, why might they have withdrawn from the engagement? Answer because of the conflict of interest.

Should they have identified the conflict of interest prior to the engagement? Yes they should have so that they would not have to lose face and eventually withdraw from the engagement.

They should not necessarily turn down the engagement but they should not have staffed the engagement with a person who has a conflict of interest.

Your point about no one being able to work with anyone is false. The whole reason there are reviews of conflicts of interest before the engagement, of which you are aware, is to avoid these matters.

I suggest that if OP could not staff the engagement with a crew that is free of conflict then they should not have accepted the engagement, and that is correct, as evidenced by OP ceasing the engagement after it was determined there was a COI.

And finally where I agree with you is when you state

The only thing that OP could have done better is research the firm prior to staffing



You are correct OP was in the wrong, and they should have identified the COI prior to staffing.

So yeah I disagree with everything you claim except the part where you claim that OP could have done more the research and avoid the COI that was present in their engagement.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News