InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 53
Posts 3429
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/26/2013

Re: flipper44 post# 58758

Tuesday, 04/12/2016 10:04:57 AM

Tuesday, April 12, 2016 10:04:57 AM

Post# of 703810
My first reaction to your question on whether Direct has/will obtain a SPA for phase II is that the process takes a long time to negotiate but well worth it in getting FDA buy-in; hence part of the reason for the long delay in getting this study started. My second reaction is initially thinking that that this is not happening since if I was a biotech CEO, I would mention that I was negotiating w the FDA on a SPA. But then thinking about it, I usually hear about a SPA negotiation occurring at a healthcare conference or quarterly meeting CC since it’s not worth a PR till there is actual agreement. While there isn’t an opportunity to mention it at a quarterly meeting, they did have the Annual in December and I don’t think it was mentioned there. So to sum up (my reactions), it makes total sense that they are proceeding w a SPA and if I believe they are then I’m pretty peeved that they didn’t mention that they are negotiating w the FDA on it since it keep investors excited on anticipation of a SPA.

OK, I just read your follow-up where you state

Normally a SPA can only be given for Phase III trials

That could explain the hesitancy in mentioning any SPA negotiation. Never mind.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News