Its fascinating to me that I can post ACTUAL REASONS why I believe Seth Shaw is full of BS.
I posted all these reasons...
Sorry...don't buy it... Look at the way he behaves.
Look at the way he claims to be here to correct misinformation; yet if there is any misinformation that might be seen as positive? Never a peep out of him.
Look at the websites associated with this CONpany, they are all either defunct or full of MISINFORMATION! He's here to correct misinformation, but can't even keep his own doorstep clean?
Look at the way he plays the blame game.
I could go on... I've seen this playbook before. And yes...I say CONpany... Because real companies sell a product or provide a service. CONpanies sell shares.
What does TAUG do? Oh...right...don't believe their website! "The mission of the company is to acquire and build a balanced portfolio of life sciences assets without typical clinical regulatory timelines. Currently Tauriga has two principal businesses: a consumer natural wellness business that includes medicinal (not recreational) cannabis products and non-cannabis-containing dietary supplements, and a synthetic biology platform for industrial cleantech, namely a “wastewater to value” technology. The two businesses provide good balance by sector and by customer type, yet both rely on innovative science, and both have an overall “green” theme. Tauriga’s business model includes the acquisition of licenses, equity stakes, rights on both an exclusive and non-exclusive basis, and entire businesses."
Pathetic.
ALL of these statements have links to back them up... I didn't include them in this post, but I, or others, have posted them before.
Where was the rebuttal? Where were the LINKS to support the Seth Shaw is great argument? *crickets*
I posted some very specific examples ...including links... of things that occurred right after Seth Shaw returned to the CEO position in July.
I'll go further, and ask you to explain a couple of things (related to TAUG) that happened right out of the gate, after Seth's resumption of the CEO position in July.
Explain to me why this item was NOT in the 8K, and was ONLY found in the 14A. "Group 10 Holdings Convertible Note Financing
On July 14, 2015, the Company entered into a Convertible Debenture with Group 10 Holdings, LLC (“Group 10”) in the principal amount of $96,000 with a maturity date of July 14, 2016 (the “Group 10 Note”). The Company received gross proceeds of $80,000 under the Group Note. The proceeds from the Group 10 Note were used for the payment under the Final Settlement Agreement. The Company granted Group 10 15,000,000 commitment shares of common stock in consideration of the Group 10 Note.
Pursuant to the terms of the Group 10 Note, at any time Group 10 may convert any principal and interest due to it at the lesser of (a) 40% discount to the lowest closing bid price of the common stock for the twenty trading days prior to the conversion notice or (b) $0.005. Additionally, the discounts will be adjusted on a ratchet basis in the event the Company offers a more favorable discount rate or look-back period to a third party during the term of the Group 10 Note.
The Company may prepay the amounts under the Group 10 Note as follows: (i) if prepaid within thirty days, the Company must pay a 25% premium on all principal and interest outstanding, (ii) if prepaid after thirty days but before the one hundred and seventy-nine day, the Company must pay a 35% premium on all principal and interest outstanding and (ii) if prepaid after one hundred and seventy-nine days but before the one hundred and eighty day, the Company must pay a 45% premium on all principal and interest outstanding.
The Company agreed to reserve 200,000,000 shares of its common stock to satisfy its obligations under the Group 10 Note. This reserve will be increased to three times the number of share of common stock upon the approval of the Company’s stockholders of an increase in the number of authorized shares of common stock.
Based on the Company’s closing stock price of $0.0047 on July 13, 2015 and the 40% discount, the Company would be required to issue an additional 34,042,553 shares of its common stock under the Group 10 Note. If the Company’s stock price continues to fall, this amount will increase, perhaps substantially and cause additional significant dilution."
I REALLY doubt that MOST investors read through every item in a Proxy...especially if they already read the PRE DEF14A, and/or are expecting CERTAIN items...like "Item 1.01: Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement Item 3.02: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities" to show up in 8k's!
TELL ME WHY the Group 10 Note never made it into the 8K filed the VERY SAME DAY (no additional cost). As a side note, because it was just in the 14A, we never had the actual note in an exhibit either...
"100% transparent"???
2. The vote was set for the 27th. Seth has CLAIMED repeatedly, that TAUG was clueless about the Cowan mess until "July 23rd"... We have no way of KNOWING if this is true or false...we are just supposed to accept it.
Note that the 23rd IS before the 27th... Note that while the SEC gives company's "4 days" to file "material events", that there is nothing to preclude them from filing the information earlier...say on Friday July 24th. Or AT LEAST by Monday the 27th, so the SHAREholders could have this information available.
3. Here is another wording discrepancy... Notice in the Group 10 Note above... "On July 14, 2015, the Company entered into a Convertible Debenture with Group 10 Holdings, LLC (“Group 10”) in the principal amount of $96,000 with a maturity date of July 14, 2016 (the “Group 10 Note”). The Company received gross proceeds of $80,000 under the Group Note. The proceeds from the Group 10 Note were used for the payment under the Final Settlement Agreement."
As for the $80,000 investment that is being referenced, there is no correlation between that and anything having to do with Typenex. To makes this point abundantly clear, the Company wired $230,000 USD to Typenex in early June 2015 to satisfy all obligations under the January 2015 settlement agreement between Typenex and Tauriga. The wire from Group 10 Holdings was received in mid July 2015, a month and a half later. Clearly this $80,000 was NOT used to pay Typenex.
My reply
I have ASKED repeatedly for this to be explained...and you STILL basically ignored the issue... Quote: Clearly this $80,000 was NOT used to pay Typenex.
CLEARLY? HOW IS THAT CLEAR??? It was not for Typenex? GREAT...BUT THEN WHAT "FINAL SETTLEMENT" WAS IT FOR??? IS THERE ANOTHER "FINAL SETTLEMENT" THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS ARE NOT AWARE OF??? Because I am only aware of ONE "final settlement"...Typenex... WHAT DID I MISS??? I'm not making this wording up...ITS COMES DIRECTLY FROM YOUR FILING!!! http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1142790/000149315215003021/def14a.htm "On July 14, 2015, the Company entered into a Convertible Debenture with Group 10 Holdings, LLC (“Group 10”) in the principal amount of $96,000 with a maturity date of July 14, 2016 (the “Group 10 Note”). The Company received gross proceeds of $80,000 under the Group Note. The proceeds from the Group 10 Note were used for the payment under the Final Settlement Agreement. The Company granted Group 10 15,000,000 commitment shares of common stock in consideration of the Group 10 Note."
You come here and say it was not for Typenex...but completely fail to explain the wording in the filing... OR why it was not in the 8K...filed the very same day (7/17) as the filing it DID appear in (the DEF 14A 7/17)!
Where was the rebuttal? Where were the LINKS to support the Seth Shaw is great argument? *crickets*
Why is so hard to get anything more than just statements like
...WE BELIEVE IN SETH SHAW!
and similar?
I heard how Seth was "fooled" by people... first Stella and then Kimmel... (do we go back further and include others? Like HarNoy? or Harmon?) What about "Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me?" And...in regard to the travesty at BVAP... WHO CAN EXPLAIN???
Tell me what was going on in Seth's head when the numerous issues were brought up here... How was it that he brushed off (ignored) the many many warning signs?
You said
My entire point was that anyone can be fooled by anyone
We all know he not only reads the board but posts here. So during the time when many people brought up many issues, and he was reading it all; how was he able to dismiss EVERYTHING and just "trust" Kimmel?
Yes...Trust is a wonderful thing... But it seems that some are just willing to swallow whatever swill Mr. BSeth sets before them.
IS THERE ANYONE WHO CAN PROVIDE ACTUAL REASONS??? IS THERE ANYONE WHO CAN EXPLAIN AWAY THE GLARINGLY OBVIOUS REASONS NOT TO "JUST TRUST" SETH SHAW??? Because, unlike what we are expected to believe Seth Shaw did at BVAP... I AM UNABLE TO JUST IGNORE THE MANY MANY WARNING SIGNS.
I'll wait right here for FACTS/LINKS... ANYTHING substantive... but, as always, I'm sure I'll hear *crickets*
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
AI
